Can the Modi govt overcome the CJP setback?

The common refrain among critics of Prime Minister Narendra
Modi's government is that it has been "rattled" by the recent
agitation by the Cockroach Janta Party over the NEET exam paper leak, forcing
the resignation of Dharmendra Pradhan as Education Minister.
The government's climbdown ended
not just with Pradhan's exit. It promptly accepted all the other demands of the
CJP, including monetary compensation for the families of students who died by
suicide after the paper leak, and the withdrawal of FIRs, which is a routine
action by the police, against protesters.
There is also a view in opposition
circles that it will take time for the Modi government to recover from the
setback in time for the next round of assembly elections in the states of Uttar
Pradesh, Gujarat, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Goa, Manipur and Himachal Pradesh,
scheduled for 2027.
Will the CJP agitation influence the assembly elections, particularly in Uttar
Pradesh, India's most populous state, which is also the Prime Minister's
parliamentary constituency, and Gujarat, Modi's home state?
Has the CJP agitation dented the
perceived political and electoral invincibility of the Modi government? For
more than a decade, the BJP has carefully crafted an image of the Modi
government as one that takes firm decisions. The climbdown in responding to the
CJP's demands, however, is not new.
During its 12 years in office, the
Modi-led BJP has rolled back several decisions. True, the BJP has won three
successive general elections under Modi's leadership since May 2014. But there
have been a number of occasions when the party lost state polls, the most
notable being in the heartland states of Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and
Rajasthan in 2018.
While electoral defeats and policy
reversals under public pressure are often interpreted as a decline in Modi's
charisma, the assessment within the BJP is that they also present an
opportunity for course correction and a recalibration of political strategy in
line with changing public sentiment.
In 2015, the government proposed
amendments to the Land Acquisition Act to facilitate infrastructure projects.
Facing stiff opposition from farmers, political parties and social activists,
the government withdrew the amendments.
In March 2018, the Supreme Court
whittled down certain provisions of the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe
(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, sparking protests from the SC/ST community and
NDA allies.
The government first brought in an
ordinance and later restored the original provisions through Parliament. The
move, however, angered sections of the upper-caste community and was considered
a factor in the BJP's defeat in the assembly elections in Madhya Pradesh,
Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh in November 2018.
The government's three
controversial farm laws in 2020 gave rise to widespread protests in Punjab,
Haryana and Uttar Pradesh. The agitation at Delhi's borders lasted for about a
year before the laws were repealed in November 2021. The BJP retained power in
the Uttar Pradesh assembly elections in 2022.
But the agitation by young people
and students could prove to be a different ball game for the BJP in the run-up
to next year's state elections and the 2029 parliamentary election because they
make up a sizeable chunk of India's more than 900 million electorate.
That the BJP may have reason to
worry is indicated by the fact that the daughters of at least two party leaders
joined the CJP protests over the NEET exam paper leak.
The daughter of Assam Revenue and
Disaster Management Minister Keshab Mahanta was reportedly seen at a student
protest in Guwahati last Thursday. Purported videos also showed her criticising
the Centre and opposing police action against protesters.
In Odisha, BJP MP Aparajita
Sarangi's daughter posted on Instagram celebrating Pradhan's resignation, later
writing: "All of BJP, including anyone I am related to, is with Dharmendra
Pradhan. I am with the students. This is democracy."
















